Director
Quentin Tarantino's cameo as an employee for the LeQuint Dickey Mining Co. |
You either love him or hate him;
Tarantino once again proves to be one of the most divisive directors in the
business. That being said you probably already know if you’ll like the new
Tarantino flick Django Unchained.
Much like his other movies, Django is
heavily stylized implementing intense violence with long drawn out tension.
Putting a twist on the spaghetti western genre, Tarantino tells the tale of a
man freed from slavery who tries to find and rescue his wife from a similar predicament,
all the while seeking vengeance on those who have wronged him.
Christoph Waltz as Dr. King Shultz (left) and Jamie Fox as Django (right) |
Leonardo DiCaprio as Calvin
Candie;
owner of the cotton plantation Candyland
|
The atmosphere of the film remains casual for the most part. It is clear
that it doesn’t take itself too seriously and that makes it all the better.
Comic relief evenly spread throughout the film to relieve tension at key points.
In addition, some liberty is given and various cameos are seen throughout
including director Tarantino as an employee for a mining company.
However some common complaints with the film are its pacing. Though it
is Tarantino’s style, at times the film is tedious and the viewer is often left
wondering why something has dragged on so long particularly as the running time
approaches three hours. At times, it seemed like the movie might have warranted
an ending at that point. As well, some may find the violence graphic and
unnecessary while the profane language is unnecessary, particularly the use of
the derogatory term n*gger. However this I believe is excusable considering its
historical context.
Django Unchained proves itself an apt movie. Well it has its
downfalls it more than makes up for it. Despite its inconsistency if you are
willing to sit through some dry spells you will be rewarded with some truly excellent
scenes. Though Django Unchained is no
masterpiece, it is a more than adequate film which I can wholeheartedly
recommend if you’ve got the stomach for it.
I heard great things about this movie. Jamie Foxx is a jack of all trades but I have never actually seen one of his acting pewrformances. I noticed you said that he was not successful at playing the lead. Was it his acting skills or just him in general. If so, who would have been a better choice?
ReplyDeleteI was just disapointed that with all of the talent they had in their cast that they had Foxx as the lead. I mean he wasn't bad he was just plain compaired to everyone else. Off the top of my head I can't think of a replacement but a no name actor would have done fine.
ReplyDelete